This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cinciripini, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cinciripini, P. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Changing Food Selections in a Public Cafeteria

An Applied Behavior Analysis

University of Texas Medical Branch

The current study evaluated the influence of three behavioral procedures on the eating behavior of lunch-time patrons in a university cafeteria. A total of 5542 observations were made over a 16-month period. Food selections were unobtrusively recorded as the subjects passed through the checkout lines. A determination of sex/weight class was also made (male/female lean, normal, or obese). Using a series of reversal (ABA) designs, the subjects were exposed to the following procedures: Caloric feedback prior to food selection; labeled items to indicate nutritionally favorable choices; and a token system in which a cash rebate was made contingent on appropriate food selection behavior. The results showed that the token system produced the most uniform increases in vegetables, soup, fruit, chicken, fish, turkey, and salad consumption, while consumption of high-fat and dessert items was reduced. Caloric feedback was associated with decreased carbohydrate, red meat, and dairy product consumption, with little increase in other areas. Labeling had isolated effects on obese subjects' vegetable, soup, and fruit consumption. Female obese were found to be the most sensitive to all the procedures, and male obese the most resistant. Implications for the treatment of obesity and self-regulation of eating behavior are discussed.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 8, No. 4, 520-539 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455840084004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. H. Chu, E. A. Frongillo, S. J. Jones, and G. L. Kaye Improving Patrons' Meal Selections Through the Use of Point-of-Selection Nutrition Labels Am J Public Health, November 1, 2009; 99(11): 2001 - 2005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H Epstein, K. K Dearing, R. A Paluch, J. N Roemmich, and D. Cho Price and maternal obesity influence purchasing of low- and high-energy-dense foods Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 914 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Mayer, P. M. Dubbert, and J. P. Elder Promoting Nutrition at the Point of Choice: A Review Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1989; 16(1): 31 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Foster, M. G. Aamodt, J. A. Bodenmiller, J. G. Rodgers, R. C. Kovach Jr., and D. A. Bryan Effect of Menu Sign Position on Customer Ordering Times and Number of Food-Ordering Errors Environment and Behavior, March 1, 1988; 20(2): 200 - 210. [Abstract]

				K. Glanz and R. M. Mullis Environmental Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating: A Review of Models, Programs, and Evidence Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1988; 15(4): 395 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]