Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallander, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallander, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

It May Not Be Worth the Effort!

Trained Judges' Global Ratings as a Criterion Measure of Social Skills and Anxiety

Jan L. Wallander

University of Southern California

Anthony J. Conger

David G. Ward

Purdue University

Within the social skills research area, the ratings of trained judges are presumed to be of better reliability compared to those of untrained peers, but possibly at a cost in social validity since the latter directly represents the criterion. To investigate these issues, videotapes were obtained of 12 males who interacted with a female confederate in a typical four-minute simulated heterosocial situation. These were exhibited to a group of judges who had been trained to rate social skills and anxiety, and to a group that had received no training in this task. Judge types did not differ in mean levels of social skills and anxiety ratings, suggesting that trained judges' impressions are socially valid. However, the trained judges' interrater reliability was only slightly better than that of the peer judges. The latter finding was used to argue that untrained peer judges possibly can be used just as well as trained assistants to provide criterion ratings in social skills research.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 7, No. 2, 139-150 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455830072001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. L. Wallander, J. P. Curran, and P. E. Myers
Social Calibration of the SSIT: Evaluating Social Validity
Behav Modif, July 1, 1983; 7(3): 423 - 445.
[Abstract]