Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ollendick, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ollendick, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Self-Monitoring and Self-Administered Overcorrection

The Modification of Nervous Tics in Children

Thomas H. Ollendick

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

The relative contribution of self-monitoring and competing response practice to the effectiveness of the Azrin and Nunn (1973, 1977) habit-reversal procedure was investigated in two children exhibiting nervous tics. A multiple baseline design across settings was employed for each child and the reliability of self-monitoring was determined. Results indicated that both children were capable of reliable self-monitoring and that self-monitoring alone was sufficient to reduce tics in one of the children. For the other child, who presented a longer history of tics, it was necessary to include competing response practice with the self-monitoring. For both children, change was setting specific. Issues of generalization were discussed.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 5, No. 1, 75-84 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/014544558151006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. Piacentini and S. Chang
Habit Reversal Training for Tic Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Behav Modif, November 1, 2005; 29(6): 803 - 822.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. E. Carr and I. M. Chong
Habit Reversal Treatment of Tic Disorders: A Methodological Critique of the Literature
Behav Modif, November 1, 2005; 29(6): 858 - 875.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
A. L. Meidinger, R. G. Miltenberger, M. Himle, M. Omvig, C. Trainor, and R. Crosby
An Investigation of Tic Suppression and the Rebound Effect in Tourette's Disorder
Behav Modif, September 1, 2005; 29(5): 716 - 745.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
D. W. Woods, R. G. Miltenberger, and A. D. Flach
Habits, Tics, and Stuttering: Prevalence and Relation to Anxiety and Somatic Awareness
Behav Modif, April 1, 1996; 20(2): 216 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]