This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Flett, G. L. Articles by Hewitt, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Flett, G. L. Articles by Hewitt, P. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Positive Versus Negative Perfectionism in Psychopathology

A Comment on Slade and Owens's Dual Process Model

York University

Paul L. Hewitt

University of British Columbia

This article reviews the concepts of positive and negative perfectionism and the dual process model of perfectionism outlined by Slade and Owens (1998). The authors acknowledge that the dual process model represents a conceptual advance in the study of perfectionism and that Slade and Owens should be commended for identifying testable hypotheses and future research directions. However, the authors take issue with the notion that there are two types of perfectionism, with one type of perfectionism representing a "normal" or "healthy" form of perfectionism. They suggest that positive perfectionism is motivated, at least in part, by an avoidance orientation and fear of failure, and recent attempts to define and conceptualize positive perfectionism may have blurred the distinction between perfectionism and conscientiousness. Research findings that question the adaptiveness of positive forms of perfectionism are highlighted, and key issues for future research are identified.

Key Words: perfectionism • motivation • fear of failure • anxiety • psychopathology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?