Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Craighead, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Craighead, W. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Classroom Treatment of Psychotic Children

Specificity of Responses to Operative Contingencies

Andrew W. Meyers

Memphis State University

W. Edward Craighead

Pennsylvania State University

Behavior modification procedures were employed to treat four psychotic children in a classroom setting. Four treatment phases (baseline, a teacher-attention multiple baseline, reversal, and token reinforcement multiple baseline were utilized) and extensive recordings of teacher and pupil behavior were taken. All categories of inappropriate student behavior decreased, and appropriate student behavior increased during treatment. But no multiple baseline effects within each treatment and no reversal effects were observed. Teacher behavior showed an improvement over baseline, but no reversal of teacher behavior occurred during the reversal condition. The teacher did not discriminate among inappropriate student behaviors within treatment as demanded by the multiple baseline design. This accounted for the absence of any reversal and within-treatment multiple baseline effects on student behavior. Appropriate student behavior did increase from baseline to the teacher-attention phase and from teacher-attention to the token reinforcement phase. Detailed recordings of teacher-pupil interaction revealed a remarkably specific student response to the operative teacher-delivered contingencies. The results of this study indicate that psychotic children may be maintained and educated in the classroom setting.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 3, No. 1, 73-96 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/014544557931005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?