|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Statistical Comparison of Four Effect Sizes for Single-Subject Designs
Jonathan M. Campbell
University of Memphis, jcampbel{at}coe.uga.edu
Controversy exists regarding appropriate methods for summarizing treatment outcomes for single-subject designs. Nonregression- and regression-based methods have been proposed to summarize the efficacy of single-subject interventions with proponents of both methods arguing for the superiority of their respective approaches. To compare findings for different single-subject effect sizes, 117 articles that targeted the reduction of problematic behaviors in 181 individuals diagnosed with autism were examined. Four effect sizes were calculated for each article: mean baseline reduction (MBLR), percentage of nonoverlapping data (PND), percentage of zero data (PZD), and one regression-based d statistic. Although each effect size indicated that behavioral treatment was effective, moderating variables were detected by the PZD effect size only. Pearson product-moment correlations indicated that effect sizes differed in statistical relationships to one another. In the present review, the regression-based d effect size did not improve the understanding of single-subject treatment outcomes when compared to nonregression effect sizes.
Key Words: meta-analysis quantitative synthesis single-subject design
Behavior Modification, Vol. 28, No. 2,
234-246 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0145445503259264

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Alwell and B. Cobb
Functional Life Skills Curricular Interventions for Youth With Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,
August 1, 2009;
32(2):
82 - 93.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Alwell and B. Cobb
Social and Communicative Interventions and Transition Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,
August 1, 2009;
32(2):
94 - 107.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-H. Ma
The Effectiveness of Intervention on the Behavior of Individuals With Autism: A Meta-Analysis Using Percentage of Data Points Exceeding the Median of Baseline Phase (PEM)
Behav Modif,
May 1, 2009;
33(3):
339 - 359.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Tran Nguyen Templeton, R. S. Neel, and E. Blood
Meta-Analysis of Math Interventions for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,
December 1, 2008;
16(4):
226 - 239.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Manolov and A. Solanas
Comparing N = 1 Effect Size Indices in Presence of Autocorrelation
Behav Modif,
November 1, 2008;
32(6):
860 - 875.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Ganz, M. Kaylor, B. Bourgeois, and K. Hadden
The Impact of Social Scripts and Visual Cues on Verbal Communication in Three Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,
June 1, 2008;
23(2):
79 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Fox, C. A. Holtz, and A. L. Barcelona
Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Aggression in a Young Man with Mental Retardation: Long-Term Treatment in a Community-Based Setting
Clinical Case Studies,
February 1, 2008;
7(1):
42 - 53.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. W. Van der Burg, R. Didden, P. H. Jongerius, and J. J. Rotteveel
Behavioral Treatment of Drooling: A Methodological Critique of the Literature With Clinical Guidelines and Suggestions for Future Research
Behav Modif,
September 1, 2007;
31(5):
573 - 594.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Lee, R. L. Simpson, and K. A. Shogren
Effects and Implications of Self-Management for Students With Autism: A Meta-Analysis
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities,
January 1, 2007;
22(1):
2 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Alwell and B. Cobb
A Map of the Intervention Literature in Secondary Special Education Transition
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,
January 1, 2006;
29(1):
3 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|