This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Farmer-Dougan, V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Farmer-Dougan, V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Disequilibrium Analysis of Incidental Teaching

Determining Reinforcement Effects

Illinois State University

An important goal of reinforcement models and procedures is to predict the direction and magnitude of reinforcement effects. Although traditional models of reinforcement have been unable to adequately predict effects, Timberlake and Farmer-Dougan (1991) have suggested that the disequilibrium model provides such a framework for specifying reinforcers ahead of time. Further, they suggest that incidental teaching may be one procedure in which such predictions may be made. The present experiment investigated the reinforcement effects produced by changes in the probability of disruption of an initiation to a toy item. Four preschoolers served as the participants in the experiment. Results indicated that there appeared to be an optimal level for disrupting ongoing behavior, above or below which reinforcement effects greatly suffered. These findings, although not a direct test of the disequilibrium model ol reinforcement, are consistent with and predicted by the model.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 22, No. 1, 78-95 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455980221005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?