Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcconnachie, G.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mcconnachie, G.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, E. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Child Behavior Problems on the Maintenance of Intervention Fidelity

Gene Mcconnachie

State of Washington Division of Developmental Disabilities

Edward G. Carr

State University of New York at Stony Brook

Maintenance of behavior change has been considered a crucial, though largely unrealized, goal of behavioral interventions. One often overlooked factor is that before interventions can be successful and durable, the intervention protocol must be implemented as planned. This study investigated the effects of child behavior problems on the maintenance of intervention fidelity by teachers across two intervention protocols: escape extinction and functional communication training. A high rate of behavior problems during escape extinction appeared to punish teachers' efforts, and fidelity deteriorated. In contrast, there was a low rate of behavior problems during functional communication training. Teachers maintained high protocol fidelity and those sessions were less stressful and more productive. We propose that intervention protocols can be differentiated by the costs associated with implementing them faithfully. Protocols designed to be user friendly will be more likely to produce high fidelity, and therefore, durable intervention gains.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 21, No. 2, 123-158 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455970212001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Positive Behavior InterventionsHome page
S. Clarke, J. Worcester, G. Dunlap, M. Murray, and K. Bradley-Klug
Using Multiple Measures to Evaluate Positive Behavior Support: A Case Example
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, July 1, 2002; 4(3): 131 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Positive Behavior InterventionsHome page
C. C. Jensen, G. McConnachie, and T. Pierson
Long-Term Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Severe Problem Behavior: A 63-Month Evaluation
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, October 1, 2001; 3(4): 225 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
L. Levin and E. G. Carr
Food Selectivity and Problem Behavior in Children with Developmental Disabilities: Analysis and Intervention
Behav Modif, July 1, 2001; 25(3): 443 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Positive Behavior InterventionsHome page
D. R. Moes and W. D. Frea
Using Family Context to Inform Intervention Planning for the Treatment of a Child with Autism
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 40 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]