Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeGiovanni, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeGiovanni, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Unbinding Assertion and Aggression in Research and Clinical Practice

Ina Sue DeGiovanni

State University of New York at Buffalo

Norman Epstein

State University of New York at Buffalo

This paper documents widespread failure of the clinical and research literature to differentiate assertiveness from coercive aggressive behavior. Confusion with aggression is tied to early theoretical models, semantic errors, and differential value judgments. Recent concepts and research bearing upon the differentiation of assertion and aggression are reviewed. Standard self-report and behavioral measures of assertion are evaluated in terms of (a) confounding with aggression, and (b) failure to provide separate assessment of aggression. Adequate evidence of discriminant validity (in this case, the ability to discriminate between the constructs of assertion and aggression) is lacking for all measures reviewed. However, particular instruments have considerable promise. Recommendations are made for improving discriminant validity of self-report and behavioral methods of assessing assertion.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 2, No. 2, 173-192 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014544557822002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. G. Beck and R. G. Heimberg
Self-Report Assessment of Assertive Behavior: A Critical Analysis
Behav Modif, October 1, 1983; 7(4): 451 - 487.
[Abstract]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
P. A. Fehrenbach and M. H. Thelen
Behavioral Approaches to the Treatment of Aggressive Disorders
Behav Modif, October 1, 1982; 6(4): 465 - 497.
[Abstract]