Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hundert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batstone, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hundert, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batstone, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Practical Procedure to Maintain Pupils' Accurate Self-Rating in a Classroom Token Program

Joel Hundert

The Sir James Whitney School

David Batstone

University of Western Ontario

A procedure to produce and maintain accurate self-rating was examined in a special education class of a children's psychiatric facility. Four subjects completed individualized arithmetic assignments under three experimental conditions in a multiple-baseline design: Baseline, consisting of teacher-scoring; Reinforced Self-Reporting, consisting of self-scoring for reinforcement; and Surveillance, consisting of self-scoring for reinforcement and submission of the completed assignments to the teacher with threat of punishment for inaccuracies. The threat, however, was never actually carried out. For three subjects, self-ratings were exaggerated during Reinforced Self-Reporting, but became highly accurate during Surveillance. The same subjects increased their correct arithmetic performance only temporarily during Reinforced Self-Reporting, but showed a marked and persistent increment during Surveillance. The fourth subject self-rated accurately throughout and increased his correct arithmetic performance during Reinforced Self-Reporting, to persist for the remainder of the experiment. Measures of time-cost to the teacher indicated a 50% savings during both self-rating conditions. Possible explanations for the suppressive effects of Surveillance are discussed.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 2, No. 1, 93-112 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014544557821006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?