This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heward, W. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Heward, W. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Operant Conditioning of a .300 Hitter?

The Effects of Reinforcement on the Offensive Efficiency of a Barnstorming Baseball Team

Ohio State University and Indianapolis Clowns Baseball Club

Nine members of a professional touring baseball team served as subjects in an experiment to test the effects of reinforcement on individual and team offensive production. A new baseball statistic, the Efficiency Average (EA), was developed and recorded as the dependent variable. The experiment was conducted via an ABAB design. During the two phases of reinforcement, subjects' EAs were posted in the dugout prior to each game. After seven games, the three players with the highest cumulative EAs for that period were given $5.00, $3.00, and $2.00 respectively by rank order. Six of the subjects increased their offensive efficiency over baseline levels as evidenced by higher EAs during the first phase of reinforcement. Four subjects' EAs decreased with the reinstatement of baseline conditions, and EAs increased for four subjects when reinforcement was continued during the final phase. Team EA and run production was significantly higher for the 28 games when reinforcement was contingent upon EA ranking than for the 42 games when reinforcement was not available. While a functional relationship between the experimental procedures and the subjects' baseball behavior was not demonstrated by the data, several interesting effects of the intervention were noted which served to weaken experimental control. Considerations for further applied behavior analysis of athletics are discussed.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 2, No. 1, 25-40 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/014544557821002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. L. Martin, T. Vause, and L. Schwartzman Experimental Studies of Psychological Interventions With Athletes in Competitions: Why So Few? Behav Modif, July 1, 2005; 29(4): 616 - 641. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. S. Shapiro and S. Shapiro Behavioral Coaching in the Development of Skills in Track Behav Modif, April 1, 1985; 9(2): 211 - 224. [Abstract]

				H. P. Buzas and T. Ayllon Differential Reinforcement in Coaching Tennis Skills Behav Modif, July 1, 1981; 5(3): 372 - 385. [Abstract]

				L. D. Allen and B. A. Iwata Reinforcing Exercise Maintenance: Using Existing High-Rate Activities Behav Modif, July 1, 1980; 4(3): 337 - 354. [Abstract]