This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Messer, S. C. Articles by Bukstein, O. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Messer, S. C. Articles by Bukstein, O. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Child Mental Health Teen Development Teen Mental Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cognitive Distortions and Adolescent Affective Disorder

Validity of the CNCEQ in an Inpatient Sample

Duke University Medical Center

Tracy Kempton

Medical College of Ohio

Vincent B. Van Hasselt

Jane A. Null

Center for Psychological Studies Nova Southeastern University

Oscar G. Bukstein

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

Despite a proliferation of recent research examining childhood and adolescent depression, the area still lags behind the adult depression field, particularly in the investigation of cognitive correlates of affective psychopathology. To advance cognitive research with youth, the Children's Negative Cognitive Error Questionnaire (CNCEQ) was developed to provide a measure of cognitive distortions or errors in children and adolescents. Yet, few studies have employed the CNCEQ and no evidence exists supporting the validity of its four component cognitive error scales. The purpose of the present study was to examine the construct validity of the CNCEQ and its constituent scales through the use of factor analysis and criterion-group comparisons. Groups of adolescent psychiatric inpatients, diagnosed as affective or disruptive disordered, completed the CNCEQ following admission. Results failed to support the implicit four-factor structure of the CNCEQ, instead suggesting the appropriateness of a single-factor solution labeled "negative thinking." Despite no diagnostic group differences on the CNCEQ total or other scale scores, affective disordered patients evinced more cognitive errors on the Overgeneralizing scale. Findings suggest that the CNCEQ in its current stage of development holds promise, yet requires refinement to produce a valid measure of cognitive functioning in youth.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 18, No. 3, 339-351 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455940183006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?