Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Body-Image Marking

Validity of Body-Width Estimates as Operational Measures of Body Image

Cheryl D. Thomas

University of Windsor

Richard J. Freeman

Simon Fraser University

The relation of image-marking estimates of body width (IM) to actual widths, to other indices of body-size perception, and to measures of body satisfaction were examined using data obtained in a nonclinical sample of 200 women. The results of regression and correlational analyses were as follows: (a) actual widths accounted for only a small proportion of the variance in TM estimates, (b) the variance in IM estimates remaining after actual width was accounted for was not meaningfully related to other body-image indices, and (c) actual widths were more highly correlated with other body-image indices than were differences between estimated and actual widths (IM estimate-actual width). The current results suggest that most of the variance in IM estimates is error variance. Possible methodological confounds, which may bias women's estimates of body widths in the direction of overestimation, are discussed.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 15, No. 2, 261-270 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455910152009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?