Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bolt, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, G. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bolt, E. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Some Effects of Combining Reinforcers in Operant Training with Mentally Handicapped Persons

Glyn V. Thomas

Hilary Faulkner

Elizabeth G. Bolt

University of Birmingham

Two experiments investigated the conventional practice of combining social and tangible rewards as a compound reinforcer in operant training procedures for mentally retarded persons. In the first experiment, there were no significant differences in acquisition of a color discrimination between subjects receiving combined social and food reinforcement and those receiving only one of the component reinforcers. In subsequent extinction, subjects who had received social reinforcement on its own responded more than combined reward subjects, who did not differ in extinction responding from food reward alone subjects. In the second study, higher rates of a simple manipulative response were established during training with food reinforcement alone and with combined reinforcement than with social reinforcement alone. Nevertheless, resistance to extinction was again superior after social reinforcement alone than after the food or combined reinforcement. This was the case despite generalization decrements from acquisition contingencies to extinction being kept to a minimum in this second study by the use of noncontingent reinforcement as the extinction procedure. Neither experiment, therefore, found any beneficial effects of combining the rewards, either in acquisition or in subsequent extinction.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 12, No. 4, 525-548 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455880124003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?