Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcconaghy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Allcock, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mcconaghy, N.
Right arrow Articles by Allcock, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Behavior Completion Versus Stimulus Control in Compulsive Gambling

Implications for Behavioral Assessment

Nathaniel Mcconaghy

Prince of Wales Hospital

Michael S. Armstrong

Private Practice, Sydney, Australia

Alex Blaszczynski

Prince of Wales Hospital

Clive Allcock

Parramatta Psychiatric Center

Twenty subjects were randomly allocated to receive either imaginal relaxation (IR) or imaginal desensitization (ID) to reduce compulsive gambling. As predicted from a behavioral completion model, but not a stimulus control model, subjects' response to IR was comparable with that to ID. Also as predicted, response correlated with subjects' levels of tension following treatment. Detailed assessment of the situations in which subjects' gambling occurred was not necessary for effective IR therapy. The result established the treatment validity of the assessment used, this study being the first to compare the treatment validity of different behavioral assessments. The finding that manipulation of an organismic variable level of arousal is as effective as a manipulation of a stimulus variable in the treatment of compulsive gambling supports the trend among behavior therapists to place more emphasis on the importance of organismic variables as determinants of pathological behaviors.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 12, No. 3, 371-384 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455880123004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clinical Case StudiesHome page
E. Echeburua and J. Fernandez-Montalvo
Psychological Treatment of Slot Machine Pathological Gambling: A Case Study
Clinical Case Studies, July 1, 2002; 1(3): 240 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
H. R. LESIEUR
Costs and Treatment of Pathological Gambling
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 1998; 556(1): 153 - 171.
[Abstract]