Behavior Modification

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garner, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garner, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Behavior Modification, Vol. 11, No. 4, 398-431 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455870114002

Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa

A Critical Appraisal

David M. Garner

University of Toronto

Christopher G. Fairburn

University of Oxford

Ron Davis

University of Toronto

Specific distorted attitudes toward weight and shape have been identified as important in the development and maintenance of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Cognitive-behavioral (CB) treatment methods have been proposed for these eating disorders and preliminary reports of their efficacy with bulimia nervosa are reviewed. Although the results are encouraging, several conceptual and methodological issues must be addressed in the interpretation of findings. Inadequate and inconsistent definitions of CB methods are common in the current literature. Few studies depend on manuals to operationalize interventions. In some, recruitment has depended on advertisement, whereas in others it has depended on clinical referrals. In some studies, experienced therapists have been used and in others graduate students have been employed as therapists. Despite the lack of comparability among studies, there is evidence that CB intervention leads to a marked reduction in bingeing and vomiting as well as associated psychopathology. Evaluation of the proportion of patients abstinent from bingeing and vomiting at follow-up leads to a less optimistic view of success. Individual therapy appears to be somewhat more effective than group treatment in minimizing attrition and alleviating symptoms. Future studies must be aimed at a more systematic evaluation of active components in treatment and at demonstrating durability of change.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
R. I. Saunders and D. N. Saunders
Social Work Practice with a Bulimic Population: A Comparative Evaluation of Purgers and Nonpurgers
Research on Social Work Practice, April 1, 1993; 3(2): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]