Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heins, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hallahan, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heins, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hallahan, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cued and Noncued Self-Recording of Attention to Task

Elizabeth D. Heins

Stetson University

John Wills Lloyd

Daniel P. Hallahan

University of Virginia

Self-recording of attention-to-task behavior when children were cued to record by an audiotape recorder was compared with self-recording without a cue. Four boys enrolled in a special class for the learning disabled were trained to monitor and record their own attention-to-task behavior under the two conditions. Both conditions resulted in increased attending behavior in comparison with baseline, but the cued condition had greater effects than the noncued condition. Similar but less powerful effects were observed for the rate of correct arithmetic computation. Weekly observations for over two-and-one-half months following the termination of self-recording requirements revealed continuing high levels of attention to task and academic productivity for three of the boys.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 10, No. 2, 235-254 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/01454455860102006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
R. Reid
Research in Self-Monitoring with Students with Learning Disabilities: The Present, the Prospects, the Pitfalls
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1996; 29(3): 317 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
J. Webber, B. Scheuermann, C. McCall, and M. Coleman
Research on Self-Monitoring as a Behavior Management Technique in Special Education Classrooms: A Descriptive Review
Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1993; 14(2): 38 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]