Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Behavior Modification
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kazdin, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kazdin, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Role of External Variables in Self-Reinforcement

A Review

Russell T. Jones

Brown University

R. Eric Nelson

Pennsylvania State University

Alan E. Kazdin

Pennsylvania State University

The present paper reviews self-reinforcement research in behavior modification. This research suggests that a wide range of responses can be altered, including classroom deportment, academic performance, and studying as well as eating behaviors, smoking, nail-biting, and others. A major area of debate in the self-reinforcement literature is the extent to which external influences contribute to or account for behavior changes usually attributed to self-control. Without embracing a particular conceptual position, examination of the research suggests that several external variables might contribute to self-reinforcement procedures. These variables are rarely acknowledged in investigations as possible sources of influence and include a history of external control in the experiment, criterion setting for the response, self-monitoring, surveillance of the self-reinforcement process, instructional sets, and direct reinforcement or punishment contingencies for the self-reinforcing response or the target behavior. Investigation of these variables will help enumerate both the conceptual basis of self-reinforcement and reveal procedures to enhance the effects of self-reinforcement as a behavior modification technique.

Behavior Modification, Vol. 1, No. 2, 147-178 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/014544557712001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
S. J. Salend
Contingency Management Systems
Intervention in School and Clinic, January 1, 1987; 22(3): 245 - 253.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
C. M. Nelson and L. Polsgrave
Behavior Analysis in Special Education: White Rabbit or White Elephant?
Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 1984; 5(4): 6 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
T. J. Coates and C. E. Thoresen
Chapter 1: Behavioral Self-control and Educational Practice or Do We Really Need Self-control?
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1979; 7(1): 3 - 45.
[PDF]